Email from Mike:

From jmichaelfinn@cox.net Thu Sep 23 11:29:47 2004
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 12:43:52 -0400
From: John M. Finn 
Reply-To: finn@physics.wm.edu
To: carlini@jlab.org
Cc: 'Jim Birchall' , 'Juliette Mammei' ,
     'Klaus Grimm' , 'Mark Pitt' ,
     'Neven Simicevic' , 'Greg Smith' ,
     'Allena Opper' , 'Tony Forest' ,
     'Norman Morgan' , 'Mike Finn' ,
     'David Armstrong' ,
     'Yongguang Liang' ,
     'Shelley Page' , 'Dave Mack' ,
     'Richard Jones' 
Subject: RE: Inelastic rates on the Cerenkov bar

    Roger,
    
    Thanks for the clarification. I got your comment confused by some of the
other analysis which would have used a larger phi cut and implicitly would
have lead to overlapping sectors. Now that I understand your point, I agree
fully with it. There is no need to insist on a flat Q2 acceptance (so long
as the shape is not pathological) since we will map it out in any event. I
apologize for overacting. I've been spending too many hours at the computer.
    Regards,
    Mike