Email from Yongguang:
From yl0094a@jlab.org Thu Sep 23 11:34:54 2004 Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 13:44:20 -0400 From: Yongguang LiangTo: Mark Pitt Cc: Roger Carlini , Jim Birchall , Juliette Mammei , Klaus Grimm , Neven Simicevic , Greg Smith , Allena Opper , Tony Forest , Norman Morgan , Mike Finn , David Armstrong , Shelley Page , Dave Mack , Richard Jones Subject: Re: Qweak working group - previous/next meeting Hi Mark/ et.al/, The simulation results I sent out last Friday is for standard 8-8-22 Boston collimator, NOT the 10-8-22 Boston collimator. Sorry, it is my mistake. Here is the elastic rate, mean Q^2, and FOM I got when simulating 100k events with Richard's new code for standard 8-8-22 Boston collimator. 1) Considering the pre-scattering bremsstrahlung of beam particle in target upstream of vertex only, elastic rate = 555 MHz, mean Q^2 = 0.02641, FOM = rate*Q^4 = 0.387 2) Considering the pre-scattering bremsstrahlung of beam particle in target upstream of vertex, and the correction of outgoing electron energy for internal bremsstrahlung, elastic rate = 475 MHz, mean Q^2 = 0.02653, FOM = rate*Q^4 = 0.334 The rate is calculated for a 2.0 m long bar at Z=530 cm with x width cut 302< x < 318 cm. and the electron energy > 1000 MeV. I did not used Richard's new event generator, but use the old event generator instead (set ISOT=1 in bash file). Attahced is a plot showing the x projection, Q^2 and theta distribution of the above two cases (the left three panels are for case 1, and the right three panels are for case 2). Best regards, Yongguang ******************************************************** * Yongguang Liang Tel: (757)269-5333 (office) * * Trailer 11A Room 2 Email:yl0094a@jlab.org * * Jefferson Lab * * 12000 Jefferson Ave. * * Newport News, VA 23606 * ******************************************************** [ Part 2, Application/POSTSCRIPT 30KB. ] [ Unable to print this part. ] comparison.ps